BOOK REVIEW
Zealot: The Life and Times of Jesus of Nazareth
Author: Reza Aslan
This book was recommended to me from two sources, a
Methodist Minister friend and from an acquaintance that found it to be an
interesting book. Both warned me to read
it with an open mind and prepare to learn something. I would repeat that warning to those reading
this book. It is not a book a Christian
fanatic will enjoy or someone with a closed mind would find value in reading,
even though this maybe the very book they should read. Those readers that are schooled in religious
studies will also have issues with this book.
There has been many different Jesus’ constructed over the
last two centuries or more. Most of
these have always been created on faith, religious needs and the current
popular beliefs. You will find few
works where the author undertook the task of looking at Jesus from a historical
personage view point. In Zealot the
Author does just that, he looks at the Jesus that lived, rebelled against the
Romans, against the status quo in the Jewish religion, the Pharisees and the
Sanhedrin.
Mr. Aslan’s book has garnered some controversy from writing
this book. There are conservative
Christians that are offended that a Muslim scholar dare right about the
Christ. Also, you will find some that
are offended by the premise that Jesus was anything but the son of God. This is not the case amount religious
scholars, especially of those of early Christianity. I have had friends that have read this book
before I did that was offended a distinction is made between Jesus of Nazareth
and Jesus the Christ. They are
unwilling to accept that Jesus is seen as two distinctly different people
historically. I have one minister friend
that was so offended and upset with this book he thought the Christian
communities should ban it.
So, let’s look at the book itself. Mr. Aslan Jesus that he
introduces us to is born in Nazareth. He grew up as a poor laborer. He becomes a discipline of John the Baptist
until John is arrested. He continues the
same teachings of John the Baptist after the arrest. Jesus, like John before him, preached the
imminent arrival of the Kingdom of God.
As I understand this author, this Kingdom was to be an earthly political
state ruled by God or his messiah. This
was controversial then as it is still today.
As you read deeper into the book you become aware that Jesus never
intended to find a church or a religion.
His intent was to reform the one that already existed for the Jews. Jesus was loyal to the Mosaic Law as he had
interpreted it. This led Jesus to oppose
the Roman overlords, their puppet representatives, the Temple priests, the
wealthy Jewish aristocracy and the Herodian elite according to Mr. Aslan.
As we all know, and expressed in this book also, Jesus went
to Jerusalem. It was here he provoked
the Romans through his actions at the temple and against the temple
officials. But that is not where Mr.
Aslan leaves it. He takes the time to
break down the actual events. One part
that was new to me and will bring further investigation on my part, was Pilates
overall hatred of the Jews and the way he dealt with them. He is shown in this book to be ruthless and
uncaring about any background. It is
even suggestion that most likely there was no long conversation at all between
Jesus and Pilate. So, being handed over
to Pilate was almost a guaranteed death sentence since he was a Jew being
accused by Jew’s. As we know, Jesus was
crucified after his meeting with the Roman Governor. But he was not crucified for his temple
actions, but for him claiming to be King of the Jews. This was considered
sedation by the Romans. Naming a King
for the Jews was reserved only for the Roman Emperor to appoint.
Mr. Aslan thesis is not new, unique or startling. His detractors say his theory is outlandish
or that a Muslim has no rights to write such a book or doesn’t understand. It is none of these. You need to accept that the audience he wrote
to is not the Christian Theologians or Clergy, nor is it be an exacting
academic study. It strikes me as written
to those that have questions, want to read a different view point or just want
to say “see I told you so” moment to some friends. It is a new look at old theories and ideas on
who Jesus was, this does not relieve him of some minor errors he makes throughout
the book. The first reading through for
me I found where he accepts and examines some statements that have been refuted
and the scholars have agreed are no longer accurate assessments. The one dealing with single Jewish men in
Judea is the most glaring statement that has been refuted. He also had minor mis-statement like claiming
the sea of Galilee is salt water when it is fresh water sea. All these are minor points that do not
distract from its overall readability.
In the end I have to say this is a good read. It presents a very plausible alternative of
the life of Jesus. I learned a few
things and was given some food for thought.
I have a few things to look further into. Just keep in mind do not take this as a good
scholarly book on Judaism, Christianity and Jesus; It is what it is meant to be
is the best I can say on this: A new
examination of Jesus the person and not Jesus the Christ. I recommend this book for anyone that wants a
non-academic look into Jesus.